This pushed me to look into third-party apps that let you mount cloud storage as a network drive and/or back up to one or several cloud storage providers among those that offer the most terabytes for the buck.ģ.5. In the distant past I used CrashPlan but their crap java client forced me to move away from that company. The integration with SharePoint is also something I use on a daily basis for work. OneDrive already comes with Windows and as such is a good way to get a core toolkit of portable applications on any of your PCs.Google Drive is great to index, search and consult PDFs and MS Office files.To make files and portable applications available across devices, I’m pretty happy with Google Drive and OneDrive respectively: Wouldn’t it be nice to have more flexibility and use the cloud as if it was just another drive? That’s what we’re going to explore in this entry. This is a data retention policy and business model choice from the likes of Backblaze, not a technical limitation. īut what if you want to back up existing folders or network drives? Then you have “cold storage” solutions such as CrashPlan or BackBlaze, but they have their own hard-set constraints and perspective on how things should work that you have to adhere to.Īnd what if you want to extend your storage into the cloud, to store stuff that you are not going to keep around locally? That’s just how sync works by definition, while the backup-oriented services will eventually (some earlier than others) drop the files that they no longer see on your local system. ![]() You pretty much have to adapt your file organization to their way of thinking and use their client. not enterprise) has “traditionally” been associated with the concept of syncing a dedicated local folder with the cloud, because it’s the way desktop apps from DropBox, Google Drive, OneDrive and the likes work. Thanks in advance.Cloud storage for consumers and small businesses (i.e. I have 15+ years experience on backend Windows systems then 2+ recent years on a Mac where I've forgotten most of what I knew about Windows, and probably 5 recent years working with hosted websites running on Linux. If it helps you know how to answer better: I'm a strong web & database developer but a moderate sysadmin at best. What is driving this are issues we are having with the client not updating Mercurial repositories and/or the client making changes on our test server while we are testing and/or expecting us to manage their changed files manually. ![]() I've managed to mostly get a proof-of-concept working but my stumbling block is figuring out how to get a desktop machine to map to a drive on the Windows 2008 server in the cloud that's my question. This would also allow them to push and pull to and from our Mercurial repository from the Windows server or possible even from their local computer using the file system connection. This would let their designer treat the server like a local hard disk just like she does when she builds CSS+HTML mockups and point the browser to the HTTP server on the web and refresh the page to see her changes. So we've like to set up a Windows server in the cloud that they can administer using RDP and where they can also map a drive directly to the Windows server in the cloud. We've ruled out using a Linux server for their development system (we of course do use Linux for our testing, staging and deployment systems) because they are not even close to being comfortable with the Linux command line. ![]() We've ruled out setting up local web stacks on their Windows computers because the client doesn't want that they worry it would slow their machines down and/or cause software conflicts, and if they have problems it's harder for us to resolve them. ![]() We are exploring the use of a Windows Server 2008 micro instance running on Amazon EC2 for a Apache+MySQL+PHP development web server that we could could administer for our client to allow their graphic designer to change and test her CSS designs using themes for the WordPress-based CMS software we've developed for them, and to allow our client to commit to our Mercurial-based repositories at.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |